27.06.13
PI
"Man kann das in Österreich nicht
sagen"
"You can't say that in Austria"

67676
376
232323
123
196
134
9111
8111
Orig.crop 571 px ~
157

17
717 177│142
567
506
149
896
19
" It seems that Islam has become a legally
protected
religion on which only Muslims can comment"
[Elisabeth
Sabaditsch-Wolff]
Orig.crop
650 px
VIDEO
H
Ist
das wirklich alles normal?
16.01.16
Bertelsbook
der
Maulkorbwächter

The
systemically relevant, politically correct, leftist
media moloch Bertelsmann censures for/on Facebook German
internet contents.
↕
Quoting German constitution:
"Eine Zensur findet nicht statt" ~
"Censorship does not take place"
↕
On the day prior, on my
way to the RECYCLING CENTER, right in front of its entrance two cars
(one behind the other) cutting my way, licensed:
333 016
A bit later, while opening the email box:

[opened/noticed
at 16:16]
no comment
→ 16.01.16
11.08.16
FaceCensorbooks
Wall of Shame→
FaceCensorbook→
political tool of Merkel,
Maas&Kahane-Stasi
troops
censored↓

Quote: "It's
the legitimate interest of our constitutional state to know
who -and
with what background- comes to our country"
law-and-order statement =
↑'Hatespeech'
↕
Jew hatred |
anti-semitism =
↓no Hatespeech

even after protests
not censored↑
6ensorship is always
an ideological tool.
Are you people crazy ?

368
Ihr
SEID verrückt
!
A certain
control (9ensorship) is important in order to avoid
crossing the red lines,
however, the control shall be in the hands of those in the
right spirit, not in the hands of the sinister manipulators,
leading you from one trap to the next trap by systematically
creating fake red lines while,
luring
*
* you with false
promises, yet hiding the true red lines. Turning therefore the universe
upside down. In their hands the
lie is sold as the truth
while the truth become a crime!
|
Der 6euchler,
sein W6rt
und die Bequemlichkeit als dessen
fruchtbarer Boden
Jedes Wort aus dem
Munde eines politischen 6euchlers u. 6anipulators
bedeutet am Ende des Tages
das Gegenteil von dem was es aus dem
Munde eines geradlinigen,
wahrheitsliebenden Menschen bedeutet.
(So sehen die
Menschenrecht nicht etwa
die Zerstörung u. Zersetzung der
Nationen vor, sondern deren Schutz vor
Invasion
* u.
Völkerwanderung.)
Doch der
unkritische weil denkfaule Mensch schluckt das eine
als das Selbe wie
das andere. Er fürchtet sowohl die eigene
Denkanstrengung wie auch die Wahrheit die nicht immer
einfach ist, wie der Teufel das Weihwasser
und bereitet
damit den Boden für die
Zerstörung
der eigenen Heimat und
Gesellschaft.
14.08.16

2
33|888
2
5|888|3
156
11|388
Orig. crop
709
px
YT
24.08.16

H
Ich sage euch Menschen, der
Menschenfeind bildet sein Reich über die dunklen
Werkzeuge der Intrigen und Angst.
→
Ich bin nicht einverstanden mit dem, was Sie
sagen, aber ich würde bis zum Äußersten dafür
kämpfen dass sie es sagen dürfen.
(Voltaire)
04.02.17
Free thought =
free word = free speech.

YT
EVERY
speech is free speech
except the one (speech) that
threatens the free speech via muzzle laws or
violence.
The free word can hurt, but
will never hurt that much than the fascists their suppression,
muzzle laws and violence.
If you don't
like hate speech, criticize it. Start
here! (this
way)
↓
07.02.17
and
this way

yet
this way
28.10.17
Twitter
smashing free speech

But who gets to decide
what is "hateful"
6|24
px
10.11.19
Dark Gravedigger of the Free Word,
and with
that of the Free World.
The Court Of Justice Of The European Union Limits Free Speech
[..] This would set a dangerous precedent where the courts of one country can control what internet users in another country can see. This could be open to abuse, particularly by regimes with weak human right records"
[..]
[..] The ruling "essentially allows one country or region to decide what internet users around the world can say and what information they can access," said Victoria de Posson, senior manager in Europe at the Computer & Communications Industry Association, an industry group that includes Google and Facebook as members.
[..] The judgment does indeed appear to be opening up a Pandora's Box for the ever-shrinking space for free speech in Europe and potentially worldwide, although it is still unclear at this point, how the judgment might affect free speech worldwide.
[..]
[..]The judgment from the Court of Justice of the European Union, in other words, appears to give EU member states unprecedented power to determine public discourse online -- to determine what citizens can and cannot read.
[..]
Europe
is no longer the free world. This rule gives to the most unfree (regions and Nations) the
legislative power over the most free one in terms of free speech.
(if at all, then the exact opposite should happen!) So, it is clear
where the journey is going. It
is clear that the above mentioned ruling slowly but surely has implications on
every European citizen. With the slow but ongoing dissolution of the
Nations the national judicatures will more and more go with the
non-democratic-legitimated supranational rules instead of their own
democratic legitimated laws and constitutions. It's mathematical.
Citizens
should know what they are giving away. But none of the big media
reports. ALL quiet! They ALL are involved in this war of the
establishment against the people.
So,
let me be very clear with this one thing:
A
jurisdiction without the anchor is no jurisdiction. It's a mafia.
Impostors.
updated
13.11.19
29.12.19
UN
joining the fight against free speech
12.11.22
A Trento una panchina bianca per la libertà di
informazione
*
|