Did
you ever try to show/explain the way to
a blind one?
The huge mistake of the atheists
is that they believe/rely in the
empty word. This
makes for "two dimensional clueless flat
thinker", "labyrinth lover", selfish
egoists, soulless apparatschiks and "no way, no target people", who believe
in no example, no standard, no banner no archetype to be
required or to be referred to, in order to fill empty words
like moral or ethic with life, spirit and sense by giving them a
concrete, firm, tangible definition.
YOUTUBE CONVERSATION 21.10.10
●
anonymous
All
major religions suck! Religion is the opium of the
people.
RELIGION IS NOT NECESSARY TO BE ETHICAL AND MORAL!
●
ogmios
You
can only criticize. Critic is good but per se is no
art. For a constructive critic you should have
respective answers or proposes, otherwise you
wasting time.
And I see that no one ever taught you to think down
to the roots, because: VALUES >
HAVE TO BE DEFINED !
Good,
evil, ethics, morality, civility, etc. are empty
words which are not defined per se. For a person of
true faith [not fake!] in the examples of authentic
teachers like Christ, Buddha, Krishna etc, the
understanding of good and evil is quite perfectly
opposed to the interpretation of the functionaries
of the lie and their prophet, the
pedofile barbar
>. So the values must be defined by the living
example [ARCHETYPE] on which they refer, or
otherwise you're just a pseudo intellectual who does
not really know what you're talking.
●
anonymous
Let
your children study otherwise they become the same!
●
ogmios
The
same goes for the word "study". Its not enough to
study, it depends on WHAT you study, or have you
forgotten that the 9.11 terrorists were all
so-called "high scholars". What is a person without
any example and what is a child with no example for
his own life, let alone if the example is a FALSE
ONE!
Are you kidding!?
●
anonymous If I say study
I do not mean fundamentalist schools (of whatever
nature) rather than to study in universities ...
something very different and that maybe you've done
nn.
●
ogmios
Please
find out more. Personally I am happy to not have
studied too much for many of those high scholars for
the many trees do not see the forest anymore.
Example: The terrorists of 9.11 have attended
universities in Germany. You refuse to see the root
of the problem, because are you afraid of
acknowledging the reality and the truth might bring
to collapse your atheist building made of paper and
empty.
●
anonymous
As a
catholic you critics the muslims but you are the
same species
●
ogmios
I do
not criticize muslims simply because they themselves
are victims of their indoctrination. I confront the
unhealthy false message of the
pagano godhood of divine barbay and pedophilia
>
as brutally shown in the example of the
pedofile barbar
>. That example - a part of the fact that in its
complex it is a totalitarian system in holy clothes
but not a religion - has NOT to be proposed as an
example to be followed by ANYONE!
And if someone like you lost in the maze of atheist
emptiness, lifts himself like a god above the true
spiritual teachers by putting them on the same level
of the pedophile barbar, then I pity you, and with
good reason.
Second thing: Who told you that I am catholic or
religious? Who told you that. Evidently you're just
another sinister bastard, one of those
pseudo-intellectual who have no scruples to put you
in your mouth things that you never said. I do not
belong to any religion and / or church rather define
myself as spiritual. In the future, learn to behave
as a civilian on the basis of genuine spiritual
teachers!
●
anonymous
Catholic or not, the problem is solved because we
atheists reject all that is metaphysics (all that
goes beyond the physical, such as the divine)
accepting only what is tangible and rationally
explicable.
●
ogmios
Atheism and 'just an escape. Atheism can not explain
anything at all and nothing. Atheism is the
philosophy of spiritual emptiness and materialism. Atheism
opens the door to the chaos & labyrinth of empty
words which brings the lie to power. Result: Hitler >,
Stalin >,
Mohammed >, Pol Pot, Saddam, Kim Yong, etc etc
etc ... Proud of??
●
anonymous
I
repeat: religion is opium for the people.
●
ogmios
Why
you continue to hide behind the word "religion" when
we finally got to the root of the authentic
teachers. You have a tremendous fear of losing your
self-esteem? You're a selfish sick, just think to
yourself, you fear the example of someone other. In
your mind you're a kid on its EGOTRIP, lost in the
maze of nowhere and nothing, and you believe or hope
that the empty and nothing may give you more freedom
than the truth.
This is the
rebellious attitude of a child when his mother takes
off the pacifier.
CONVERSAZIONE
YOUTUBE 21.10.10
●
anonym
Tutte
le piu grandi religioni fanno schifo! Religione e'
l'oppio dei popoli.
RELIGIONE NON E NECESSARIA PER AVERE ETICA E MORALE
!
●
ogmios
Su sai
solo criticare. Criticare va bene ma per se non e'
arte. Per critica costruttiva devi avere le risposte
o proposte rispettive altrimenti sprechi tempo. E
vedo che nessuno mai ti ha insegnato a pensare fino
in fondo, perche:
VALORI >
VANNO DEFINITI
!
Bene, male,
etica, morale, civilta etc sono parole vuote che non
si definiscono per se. Per una persona di fede
veritiera [non falsa!] quale crede nell'esempio vivo
di insegnanti autentici come Cristo, Budda, Krishna
etc, il bene e il male sono cose perfettamente
contrapposte all interpretazione di un funzionario
della bugia[taqiyy] come da esempio del barbaro sanuinoso>. Quindi i valori vanno definiti tramite l'esempio
vivente [L'ARCHETYPE] sul quale si riferiscono, o
altrimenti sei solo un pseudo intellettuale quale in
realta non sa di che cosa parla.
●
anonym
Fate
studiare i Vostri figli altrimenti diventeranno come
loro.
●
ogmios
La stessa cosa vale per la parola "studiare". Non
basta studiare bisogna vedere COSA si studia, o ti
sei dimenticato che i terroristi del 9.11 erano
tutti cosidetti alti "studiosi". Cose' una persona
senza esempio sano e cose' un bambino senza nessun
esempio per la sua vita, e figuriamoci poi se con
l'esempio FALSO!
MA STIAMO SCHERZANDO.
●
anonym
be se dico di studiare non mi riferisco a scuole
integraliste (di qualsiasi natura) piuttosto di
studiare nelle università...cosa ben diversa e che
forse tu non hai fatto.
●
ogmios
Ti prego. Informati meglio. Personalmente sono
contento di non aver studiato troppo "in alto"
perche in realta' I studiosi spesso tra tanti alberi
non vedono piu la foresta. Esempio: I terroristi del
9.11 hanno frequentato le universita in Germania. Ti
rifiuti di vedere la radice del problema, perche hai
paura che riconoscendo la realta' e la verita la tua
costruzione atea fatta di carta e vuoto possa
crollare.
●
anonym
Come
cattolico critichi tanto i musulmani ma siete la
stessa specie
●
ogmios
Non critico i musulmani semplici perche loro stessi
vittime della loro indottrinazione. Confronto il
messaggio del dio pagano della luna e della pioggia, e della
barbaria e pedofilia
> , quale si concretizza nell'esempio del barbaro pedofilo
> e che -a parte che nel suo complesso si
tratta di un sistema totalitario nella veste dei
santi, ma non religione - NON va proposto come
esempio da seguire da CHIUNQUE !!!
E se
uno come te perso nel labirinto del vuoto, crede di
elevardi come dio al di sopra degli insegnanti
autentici mettendoli sullo stesso piano di un
barbaro pedofilo mi fai pena, GRANDE pena. E con
buona ragione.
Punto due: CHI ti ha detto che sono cattolico o
religioso? CHI te l'ha detto. Vedi che sei solo un
altro
bastardo sinistro, cioe' di quel pacco pseudo-intellettuale
che non ha scrupoli di metterti in bocca le cose
che non hai mai detto. Non appartengo a nessuna
religione e/o chiesa e semmai mi definisco
spirituale. In futuro impara a comportarti da civile
sulla base degli insegnanti spirituali autentici !
●
anonym
cattolico o no, il problema si risolve perche noi
atei rifiutiamo tutto ciò che è METAFISICO (CHE VA
OLTRE LA FISICA, QUINDI IL DIVINO, ma non solo)
accettando solo ciò che è tangibile e razionalmente
spiegabile.
●
ogmios
Ateismo e' solo una fuga. l' ateismo non riesce a
spiegare un bel nulla e niente. L'ateismo e' la
filosofia del vuoto spirituale e del materialismo.
L'ateismo apre le
porte al labirinto caotico della parola vuota che
porta al potere della bugia. Risultato: Hitler >,
Stalin >,
Mohammed >, Pol Pot, Saddam, Kim Yong, etc etc
etc... Fiero
???
● anonym
Ripeto:
religione e' l'oppio dei popoli.
●
ogmios
Perche continui a nasconderti dietro la parola "religione"
quando siamo arrivati alla radice degli insegnanti
autentici. Hai una paura tremenda di perdere la tua
autostima? Sei un egoista malato, pensi solo a te
stesso, temi l'esempio di un altro, nella mente sei
un ragazzino sull EGOTRIP, perso nel labirinto del
nulla e niente, e credi o speri che il nulla e
niente ti dia piu liberta' della verita'.
Atteggiamento da bimbo ribelle quando la mamma gli
toglie il succhietto.
ATHEISMO = PAROLE VUOTE
●
anonym
ripeti ancora la stessa cosa cioè
che gli atei =persone vuote. ripeto,crediamo in valori
diversi dai vostri.ho parlato di metafisica e non solo di
religione. egoismo? ma se ti ho appena detto che credo in
uguaglianza,pace e cooperazione tra popoli? ma che sei
stupido? dici che siamo arrivati alla radice degli
insegnamenti autentici...e quali sarebbero? hai mai
pensato che la società è piena di persone che la pensano
diversamente? l'unica via DEMOCRATICA è la LAICITà! NO AI
CROCIFISSI
●
ogmios
Il fatto che la societa e'
piena di persone che la pensano diversamente non mi
preoccupa finche le
linee rosse
> non vengono superate. I tuoi valori -a parte che
valori senza nessun esempio di riferimento ed orientamento
sono indefinibili- sono costruiti su sabbia, e sabbia
non dura. Ateismo purtroppo significa
relativismo >, cioe' la questione del
bene e del male diventa una questione puramente
individuale. In altre parole: Odio, barbaria, pedofilia,
sociopatia, violenza, terrore, sfacciataggine
islamica > hanno lo stesso diritto di fare
scuola come l'esempio sano, decente, civile degli
insegnanti di piu alta morale mai incarnati.
Anche gli stalinisti
credevano in uguaglianza, pace e cooperazione tra popoli.
Dal loro risultato barbarico vedi che non valgono un bel
nulla e niente queste parole finche non gli si riempisce
di vita e
spirito benigno
> ma di carattere, che e quello dei grandi maestri
spirituali Cristo, Budda, Krishna ed altri, altrimenti
sprechi le grandi parole ma non sapendo di cosa parli.
21.10.10
ATHEISM = EMPTY WORDS
●
anonym
you repeat the same thing that
atheists are empty people. I repeat, we believe in
different values than yours. ho spoke not only of
metaphysics and religion. selfishness? but if I just
told you that I believe in equality, peace and
cooperation between peoples? but you're stupid? say
that we got to the root of the authentic teachings
... and what would they be? did you ever think that
society is full of people who think differently? the
only way of democracy and lay people! NO TO
CRUCIFIXES
●
ogmios
The fact that
the society is plenty of people who think
differently does not bother me as long as the
red lines > are not
exceeded. Your values what ever they are [and a
part of the fact that values without any example of
reference or orientation are indefinable] are
built on sand, but sand doesn't keep. Unfortunately
atheism means
relativism > , that
means the question of good and evil becomes a purely
individual one. In other words: Hate, barbarism,
child abuse, sociopathy, violence, terror,
islamic > lie/taqiyya, falsity and
unscrupulousness get the same right to make
school as the healthy, decent, civil example of the
highest moral teachers never incarnated.
Even the Stalinists
believe in equality, peace and cooperation among
peoples. On their barbaric result you can see that
those words have zero value until not filled with
life and
benign spirit
> framed within a firm character, as shown us by the greatest
such as Christ. You may name also Buddha, Krishna and others.
Without any anchor made of a living example you
simply waste great words without any meaning.
21.10.10
YOUTUBE CONVERSATION
●
OgmiosTube
Atheism is the
philosophy of the empty word.
●
Atheist
atheism is the
world free from anyone, free to believe what
you want, not to be a slave to a CUNT.
●
OgmiosTube
right. Free to
believe for instance that pedophilia is a
good thing. Now what
●
Atheist
"Why do you care
what we choose to believe or not to
believe".Stop trolling.
●
OgmiosTube
Because I am a
responsible individual and do not want my
childern to be raped by such unprincipled
creatures which say everyone can believe what
he want and which tomorrow may claims raping
of children to be a good thing.
SHAME, SHAME, SHAME ON YOU !!!
●
Atheist
CALM DOWN.
Breathe................... Not everyone is a
rapist. Don't use a blanket term on a group of
people.
●
OgmiosTube
"Not everyone is
a rapist"
Shameless one!.
Don't tell this to me but to the raped girls
!!!
Life and moral is a question of
tangent/direction upwards or downwards.
Atheists have no direction for they have no
tangent.
So what the hell do you want to teach to your
children?
What sense of life ?
Fuck the children ? Do you want to teach the
vacuum? the zero? the nothing?
Are you crazy ?
Ogmios - Spirit
of Truth 07.04.11
faith
consists in believing what is beyond the power of reason to believe.
It is not enough for a thing be possible to be believed
Things Jesus Christ and Adolf
Hitler, things in common, something. Neither Christ
nor Hitler believed in democracy, but in the divine
right of leaders to rule, and both accepted slavery
as the natural order of society, in the same casual
manner. Thats a couple of things.
● ogmios
Your claims are simply
unashamed. JESUS CHRIST was the first humanist of
his calibre ever incarnated on this globe, and
humanism is the foundation of democracy. There
exists no democracy without humanism. You say Jesus
Christ accepted the right of leaders to rule and
slavery. Quote Jesus Christ where he says that and
where he showed that by respective dominant or
submissive lifestyle [remember he preferred to let
him nail onto the wood rather than to submit to the
power and falsity of the ruling pharisees], or
stop your filthy taqiyya. If then Jesus Christ was
against the revolution by violence but by
enlightenment, that does not mean to accept things
as they are but to solve them in the only way the
can and have to be solved permanently. Your claims
apply however to the
pedophile barbar,
which represents the quite perfect ANTIchrist.
youtube conversation
on 23.10.10
HÜLSENPHILOSOPHIE
Ihr
Atheisten seid Vakuumdemagogen. Du sagst dir reicht
die Vernunft. Aber sag mir, wie definierst du "vernünftig".
Wie definiert ein Vakuumdemagoge überhaupt
irgendetwas was nicht mit den Händen zu greifen ist,
das möcht ich mal erklärt bekommen. Ein
nicht-tangiertes Wort ist nichts als eine
bedeutungslose Hülse. So bedeutet für einen Mohammed
Anhänger "vernünftig" das ziemlich exakte Gegenteil
eines Menschen der sich an den Werten Jesus Christus'
orientiert, was für ersteren bedeutet seine Frau zu
hauen, Kinder zu heiraten und legitim Leute
umzubringen. Ihr zweidimensionalen flachdenkenden
Vakuumdemagogen hingegen haut mit allermöglichen
schlauen Wörtern um euch ohne zu wissen wie ihr sie
überhaupt greifbar definieren wollt. Ihr praktiziert
HÜLSENPHILOSPHIE!
youtube antwort am
05.11.10
RELIGIOUS
Religious
is a person whhich -without ever neglecting his own thinkwork - takes an example of the character and
principles of Christ, Buddha,
Krishna and other authentic,benign
teachers instead of
doing the exact opposite, no matter whether and to
which earthly church he claims his association and
which names he eventually used/abused for his insane or inhuman acts.
Now
I like to hear from the apostles of the vacuum for
which reason and for what motivation an apostle of
nothingness shall behave reasonably in his life..
Ogmios 05.11.10
Religiös
ist ein Mensch der sich -ohne sein eigenes
Denken jemals zu vernachlässigen - ein Charakter-
und Prinzipienbeispiel an
Christus, Buddha, Krishna und anderen authentischen,benignen
Lehrern nimmt, und nicht einer der das genaue Gegenteil tut, ganz egal ob
und zu welchem irdischen Kirchenverein er sich angehörig erklärt
und welche Namen er für seine ungesunden o. unmenschlichen Taten missbraucht.
Nun möchte ich von den Aposteln des Vakuums
[Atheisten] höhren aus WELCHEM
Grunde und aus welcher Motivation heraus ein Apostel des Nichts sich im
Leben
vernünftig verhalten soll.
Ogmios 05.11.10
Atheismus
ist die Verweigerung der Anerkennung dass das
ungehemmte irdische Fröhnen und Ausschweifen die
gesetzmäßig seelisch geistige Rückbildung des
Individuums zur Folge haben muss mit allen
dazugehörigen tragischen Konsequenzen, sowohl für das
Individuum selbst wie für die ihn umgebende
Gemeinschaft.
Amen
Ogmios 05.11.10
Terminus of Atheism
-Godlessness- is the weakening
of the spirit
with its lawful consequences. The loss of
orientation leading to chaos.
Chaos
is the fertile ground for the false Gods, the open
door to anticivilization with false godhoods and
satanisms
finally even in
holy clothes.
Atheisten sind selbstherrliche Menschen die sich selber zu
den neuen Goettern erheben. Dies ist ein ungesundes
Verhalten und bildet im Prinzip die Kerhrseite jener
Medaille auf deren gegenueberliegenden Seite jene Menschen
stehen die sich dem Buchstaben unterwerfen um angebliche
Gotteswürde zu erreichen. Beide Gruppen bilden die beiden
disbalancierten Extreme der einen und derselben Medaille.
●
Ogmios
Von
Vernunft hin zu menschenverachtend mögest du alle Wörter
benutzen die du willst. Solange sie nicht
tangiert sind bleiben sie gegenseitig austauschbar. Wenn jedes Individuum
selber definiert was ein Wort bedeutet führt dies mit
mathematischer Logik zum Chaos. Das versteht sogar ein Kind
weil es so logisch ist wie 1+1=2. Es gibt Milliarden von
Menschen die es als menschenverachtend betrachten wenn deren
Tochter einen Deutschen heiratet und die es als vernünftig
ansehen dieselbe Tochter zu ermorden, oder -wie eben in der
Tuerkei passiert- bei lebendigem Leibe zu begraben. Die Worte eines
Atheisten sind also nicht tangiert, d.h. er nimmt sich
heraus zwischen dieser und jeder anderen beliebig denkbaren
Interpretation von "Vernunft" zu wählen, mit allen Konsequenzen.
●
Anonym
Zitat
aus der Enzyklopedie "Mit Vernunft als philosophischem
Fachbegriff wird die Fähigkeit des menschlichen Geistes
bezeichnet, von einzelnen Beobachtungen und Erfahrungen auf
universelle Zusammenhänge in der Welt zu schließen, deren
Bedeutung zu erkennen und danach zu handeln -- insbesondere
auch im Hinblick auf die eigene Lebenssituation (vgl. Nous).
Die Vernunft ist das oberste Erkenntnisvermögen, das den
Verstand kontrolliert und diesem Grenzen setzt bzw. dessen
Beschränkungen erkennt. Sie ist damit das wichtigste Mittel
der geistigen Reflexion und das wichtigste Werkzeug der
Philosophie".
●
Ogmios
Das klingt ja
theoretisch sehr nett und hochgestochen, aber wir leben in
einer PRAKTISCHEN Welt nicht in einer theoretischen. Die
Erfahrungswerte eines Moslem sind nun mal diese dass der
kleine Sohn gegenueber seiner Mutter das sagen hat, weil
Frauen minderwertige Wesen sind, und gemäss deiner
Definition aus der Enzyklopedie nennt man dies Vernunft.
Wie du siehst kannst du dir deine grauen Theorien sparen
wenn du deine Wörter nicht im Geiste tangierst.
In anderen
Worten...
die
menschlichen Erfahrungswerte alleine reichen nicht aus um
Desaster zu vermeiden. Sie können genauso in die Unvernunft
führen wie in die Vernunft.
Das
berücksichtigt die Enzyklopedie leider nicht.
Zweitens:
Ein Atheist
bzw "Vakuum-Mensch" hat keine festen Prinzipien kein festes
Fundament, keinen festen Stand. D.h. sowie der Islam regiert
hast du ihm NICHTS entgegenzusetzen. Damit bist du
eine von den ersten die das Kopftuch trägt. Und schon bist
du in der Abwertsmühle.
06.11.2010
WORT-TANGIERUNG
ATHEISTISCHE VAKUUMDEMAGOGIE
VX
DAS HÖHERE
●
Anonym
[Atheist]
Oh
du verneinst Gott, weißt du selber eigentlich was du denkst
?
●
Ogmios
Ich benutze
das Wort "Gott" überhaupt nicht weil es meinen Vorstellungen
nicht entspricht. DU bist es der es benutzt und es also zu
erklären hat. Wenn du dem Wort aber keine Bedeutung
zusprichst wie kannst du dann wissen ob es dies gibt oder
nicht, Du behauptest zu wissen dass es etwas nicht gibt
obwohl du nicht weisst von was du redest.
Nullnummerndemagogie!
●
Ogmios
Was bedeutet
also für dich das Wort "Gott", was steht fur dich hinter
diesem Wort. Als Apostel des Vakuums benutzt du ja beliebig
Wörter über nicht greifbare Dinge und stellst dir das
darunter vor was dir gerade in dein zweidimensionales
Flachdenkerhirn passt, d.h. in der Regel eigentlich gar
nichts. Du weisst also nicht von was du redest.
●
Ogmios
Wenn du sagst
du glaubst nicht, ist das dein Bier.
Wenn du aber BEHAUPTEST es gibt etwas nicht, dann
musst du imstande sein das Ding irgendwie zu definieren an
dem du nicht glaubst, sonst weist du ja nicht von was du
überhaupt redest. Abgesehen davon dass eine solche
Behauptung ohne jegliche Beweise dasteht und deshalb an sich
schon ein Witz ohne Kopf und Fuss ist.
●
Anonym
[Atheist]
das
letzte mal, weil ich so gutherzig bin:
ich habe keine persönliche vorstellung von einem gott weil
ich nicht an götter glaube , aber ich weiß doch trotzdem was
das wort gott für andere bedeutet, welche erklärungen
einzelne religionen dafür herziehen und was deppen wie du
sich zusammen würfeln als gottes begriff....man man wie
flach , oder sagen wir wie es ist : dümmlich von dir !!
●
Ogmios
Also
kurz und bindig:
Da du die lebendige Blödheid bist...
...muss es
zwangweise auch die lebendige Intelligenz geben. Und die ist
das Höhere als du lebendige
Blödheit, ganz egal wo du sie vorfindest und welchen Namen
du ihr verleihst.
Das
Problem bleibt natürlich dass du als Vakuumdemagoge
[Atheist] der mit
untangierten Worten um sich schmeisst unter Intelligenz ohne
weiteres was ganz anderes verstehst als ein intelligenter
Mensch: Beispielsweise Egoismus oder Falschheit, weil dies
deinem niedrigen Verstand, deinen natürlichen niederen
Bedürfnissen und Vorstellungen entspricht.
Es gibt
auch Menschen die ihre Wörter zwar tangieren, aber falsch,
zb an den pedophilen Barbaren und dann glauben Intelligenz
sei wenn man seine Frau schlägt wenn sie nicht funktioniert,
und Töchter ermordet falls sie einen nicht-Moslem heiratet
etc, etc, etc...
Nehmen
wir die Bezeichnung "Macht": Für das intelligente Wesen
bedeutet Macht gesetzgeberisch u/o schöpferisch
[und möglichst hilfreich für den Nächsten und die
Gemeinschaft] zu wirken/tätig zu sein. Für das dumme Wesen
bedeutet Macht [auf Egoismus basierende] Willkühr.
Der
Vakuumdemagoge [Atheist] hingegen nimmt sich heraus
hineinzuinterpretieren wie ihm gerade zumute ist oder was
gerade in sein zweidimensionales Weltbild passt. Er ist also
nicht nur dumm er ist auch noch willkührlich und falsch
obendrauf.
Dasselbe
gilt für die Bezeichnung "Intelligenz". Oder der willst du
uns sagen dass du das Höchste allen Seins bist, ergo es
nichts höheres/intelligenteres als dich mehr gibt? Und wenn
du zugibst dass es intelligentere Wesen gibt als dich, wie
willst du wissen dass es nicht noch etwas intelligenteres
gibt, nur weil du es nicht kennst.
Das gesamte
Universum ist von einem für den menschlichen Verstand
undurchschaubarem Geflecht komplexter ineinander verwobener
natürlicher Gesetze durchzogen, von den kosmisch
atomaren Teilchen und Unterteilchen bis hinauf zum
Makrokosmos
von den Gravitationsgesetzen über die
Fibonacci-Gesetze hin zur
Genetik.
Komplexe Gesetze setzen bekanntlich entsprechend hohe
Intelligenz voraus.
Du glaubst doch in deiner Überheblichkeit und
Selbstherrlichkeit nicht wirklich dass du das warst der das
bewerkstelligt hat.
09.11.10
THE
VACUUM DEMAGOGUES [=ATHEISTS]
EMPTY WORD
●
Ogmios
Atheism is the philosophy of the empty [word]
●
Ogmios
And where ever the empty, there the evil gets room
enough to grow rampant
●
Anonym1
[Atheist]
I
am atheist and the world aint empty, im in love with a
beautiful woman yeah woop woop!! Ogmiostube, why cant
you admire the flowers in the garden without hoping
for fairies dancing
●
Ogmios
Atheism is the teaching of the empty labyrinth, using
empty words without tangenting them.
So, for an apostle of
the empty any word can mean everything and nothing.
You can kill anyone for love. None of your brothers
in [empty] mind would be able to explain you why this
is wrong.
●
Anonym2
[Atheist]
Atheism is the world free from anyone, free to believe
what you want, not to be a slave to a CUNT.
●
Ogmios
Right. Free to believe for instance that pedophilia
is a good thing. Now what.
●
Anonym2
[Atheist]
Why do you care what we choose to believe or not to
believe. Stop trolling.
●
Ogmios
Because a
responsible individual does not like the idea of his
children being raped by unprincipled creatures which
today claim everyone can believe what he wants then
tomorrow say raping children can be a good thing if
you believe in.
●
Anonym3
[Deist]
Dawkins'
subtraction of a higher source of morality makes it doubly
hard to condemn things like slavery and war as violating
some objective, universally-binding standard.
11.11.10
EXAMPLE OF EMPTY
WORD
The term "moral"
●
with Christian tangent / anchor
For the true Christian the word "moral" contains
the universal values of Christ, first
humanist&enlightener of his calibre ever
incarnated on this globe.
●
with antichristian tangent / anchor
For the accurately islamized the word "moral"contains
the values of the bloody moongod and his 'cut
off head'-prophet.
●
without any tangent / anchor
For atheists the word "moral" is empty. Everyone
is free to attribute a meaning based on his
current personal moods or need.
atheist
moral is
always subjective
Ogmios
I am neither religious nor atheist nor
muslim but spiritual. Atheism means
godlessness and therefore guidelessness
and without principles. For such a
person moral is indeed subjective. Since
my great example is certainly Jesus Christ
for me moral is no longer subjective, but
VERY CLEAR. It is also clear that who ever
has problems with Jesus Christ's moral has
his unholy reasons. Means he is either an
egoist or a fascist. You can chose.
24.01.11
La parola
"morale"
● con
tangente/ancora cristiana
Per
l'individuo Cristiano la parola "morale"contiene
i valori universali di Cristo, primo umanista ed
illuminatore del suo calibro mai incarnato su
questo mondo.
● con
tangente/ancora anti-cristiana
Per
l'individuo accuratamente islamizzato la parola
"morale" contiene i valori del dio sanguinoso
della luna e il suo profeta tagliatesta.
● senza
nessaun
tangente/ancora
Per l'ateo la parola "morale" e' vuota. Ogniuno
puo' attribuire il significato a secondo il suo
stato d'animo o parere personale.
People without principles and those with the
antiprinciples, hidden
and non hidden fascism. Mohammed himself the perfect
atheist, as all the other bloody tyrants ever
lived on this globe from Hitler [also trying to
become a messiah] to Kim Yong [declared god of North
Korea], to Saddam, Pol Pot, Lenin and their
functionaries all the same sinsiter fascists
who hate their natural enemies, - 1st honest work and 2nd
the TrUTH in the SPIRIT OF CHRIST - like the pest!
Gli atei in Germania hanno fatto rimuovere i
crocifissi dalle aule e dai posti pubblici, ma non
hanno agito IN NESSUN MODO contro il foullard islamico
o contro le aule di preghiera riservati ai musulmani
nelle scuole.
Atei+islam+leninisti+nazisti dietro la maschera sono
tutti fascisti camuffati e non, in variazioni
differenti che tra di loro vivono un a specie di
rapporto odio-amore.
Ogmios
14.01.11
Ateismo,
Islam, Nazismo, Communismo, tutti lo stesso stampo empio, fascisti camuffati e
non. Mohammed stesso era il perfetto ateo, come tutti gli
altri tiranni sanguinosi mai vissuti nell universo, da
Hitler [anche lui cercava di vendersi da messia] a Kim Yong
[il dichiarato dio dei nord coreani], a Saddam, a Pol Pot, a
Lenin e i loro funzionari sono tutti lo stesso stampo
fascistoida senza scrupoli che odiana il suoi nemici
naturali -1.il lavoro onesto e 2. La Verita' nello SPIRITO DI CRISTO - come la peste.
Ogmios
14.01.11
Die
Sinistren haben es hingekriegt Kreuze aus deutschen
Schulen und öffentlichen
Raeumen zu verbannen.
Dieselben Sinistren haben keinen einzigen Finger
gerührt gegen das Kopftuch, die Burka, das grausame
Halal Schlachten, extra Gebetsräume für Moslems in
Schulen, etc etc etc.
Vom
Atheisten [Vakuumideologen] zum Nazional Sozialisten,
vom Moslem zum Kommunisten, IHR seid alles gottlose
Ideologen, Ausdruck des ein und dasselben gottlosen
Geistes in verschiedenen Varianten, verbunden in der
Lüge und Selbstgefälligkeit, vorallem aber im offenen
oder kunstvoll verdeckten Hass gegen euren natürlichen
Feinden: 1.die ehrliche einfache Arbeit, 2.die
Wahrheit im Geiste Christi - die ihr beide verabscheut
wie die Pestilenzien.
Ogmios
14.01.11
THE ATHEISTS STOP AT
THE
'EMPIRICAL OBSERVATION'
ITSELF - WITHOUT ASKING
FOR A SENSE IN ORDER TO AVOID CONFRONTING THE FACT
THERE COULD BE SOMETHING HIGHER THAN THEMSELVES.
●
Ogmios
The whole universe from the microcosmos up to the
macrocosmos, plants, solar systems, genetics,
EVERYTING existing, is wired and beeing kept together
by highly intelligent laws. Intelligent laws require
respective intelligent or creative entity. Only a
SELFISH IGNORANT can ignore such fundamental basics
like 1+1=2
●
Anonym [atheist]
Wow, nice logical fallacy there. I like the non
sequitor as you leap from an unproven first clause to
a conclusion without any connection in the middle.
What data set are you using to say that the laws are
intelligently designed?
●
Ogmios
What data set are you using to prove that black is not
equal white.
Even if the laws were NOT intelligent but stupid, LAWS
DO NOT MAKE THEMSELVES !
●
Anonym [atheist]
empirical observation on the black white thing
retard. The laws of physics are the product of
collapsed quantum state. They are the way the universe
ended up as it cooled and expanded. We "make" the laws
by observation. we merely state what we observe using
empirical evidence. If you are going to make a
positive claim you need fucking evidence not
unsubstantiated declarations. What data set are you
using that proves the laws were intelligently
implemented.
●
Ogmios
YOU do
not have the faintest idea about the real nature of
the human spirit and of the universe. You just a doll
that finding water in a shell believes to have
discovered the ocean or the universe. In our
times when 1.4billion people believe a bloody doctrine
of barbary is a doctrine of peace never ever can you
convince anyone that paradoxes such as 1+1 is not 3
or that white is not black if one does not believe it.
And YOU self are living proof of that, by denying LAWS
DO NOT MAKE THEMSELVES!
So, stop to sell scientists -who TRY TO UNDERSTAND
those existing laws by what you call empirical
observation- as the makers of those laws !
Also,
the same type of unprincipled atheist soulless
scientists aparatschicks once [through your non-tangented
soulless 'empirical observations'] found the
Jewish race to be inferior and not worthy for life.
Got it?
●
Ogmios
THE CRUCIFIX
is not a symbol of a determined culture, but IS PER SE
THE SYMBOL OF CULTURE IN ITS HIGHEST EXISTING FORM!
ITS VALUE IS THEREFORE OF INESTIMABLE TIMELESS
UNIVERSAL VALIDITY!
WHO has problems with the value of culture? Who else
but the camouflaged and non-camouflaged fascists.
●
Ogmios
To
those plagiarists, unprincipled soulless aparatschicks
and false gods that rise themselves above the
crucifix, minimizing its values I can only say one
thing: In that same day when you decide to get
crucified rather than surrender to the principles of
falsity and of wealthy power, .. in that same day i
will reflect over the possible equality between your
values and the values of Christ. Even not one single
second before.
Ogmios 16.01.11
Wicked atheist 'argument':
RELIGION
BRINGS WAR ?
Answer
AUTHENTIC Religion
[=Spirit of Christ, Buddha, Krishna etc] will and can
NEVER AND AGAIN NEVER bring war over mankind.
It is:
●
1st - ideology
in religious clothes [=ISLAM] 'cooked' by you
atheists
"Nobody was ever killed in the name of disbelief."
● Ogmios
1.A total "Disbelief" or "Disbeliever" DOES NOT EXIST.
Everyone believes in something and if it is your own
egoism, that's the atheist god though since a
'disbelief' can hard be sold for bloody wars they USE
ALL KIND OF MASKS FOR THEY SELFISH UNSCRUPULOUS POWER
PURPOSES they abuse of EVERYTHING: Socialism,
nationalism, religion, they abuse of the name of
everyone including Jesus Christ if it helps for their
sinister godless targets.
●
Atheist
Atheists believe in many things but reject certain
views. That's all.
●
Ogmios
There exists
no individual which does not reject certain
views/believes so EVERY person is on one hand a
relative disbeliever but also a relative believer.
That is what I said earlier with different words: No
individual exists which doesn't believe in anything.
The question is in WHAT you believe and in WHAT you
don't believe, but also WHICH ways you use in order to
hide the truth [forest] behind some details [trees],
thats the way of the godless one. So who doesn't believe in a god, may believe
in other things like EGOISM WHICH IS THE GODLESS
ATHEISTS THEIR GOD."
Ogmios 21.01.11
RELIGIONE PORTA
GUERRA?
MAI e poi MAI un vero
credente nei valori di Gesu Cristo o altri
maestri authentici puo abusare di religione per dei fini
sanguinosi.
Ora ditemi:
CHI abusa di tutto
incluso di religione?
CHI se non le volpi
egoisti ATEI [!] nella veste dei santi e/o nella
veste dei leader populisti fascisti ??
WHO CREATED
THE CREATOR
●
anonym
[atheist]
And what created
this "Intelligent" entity? Why can the creator just exist yet
everything else in the universe requires a creator?
●
Ogmios
Without
any eternally existing entity/souce, nothing else ever
could exist or would ever have existed.
Now, would
you deny what you see, and/or your own existence? Would
you say that all existing around you is just the result
of a pure coincidence ?
The
question "why" the creator had not to be created is the
same like the children's question 'why the ball is
round'.
Atheists need to prove God doesn't exist. The burden of
proof is on you. Is he under a rock? Ridiculous! You've
been into nature and didn't find God. Ridiculous. Who
are you that God should show himself to you? You believe
the Universe exploded into existence from nothingness.
Absolute insanity. You quote Dawkins who's as irrational
as you. You say God couldn't have always been. Prove it.
You argue from the pov that you will be the judge of the
truth. Repent the kingdom of God is at hand.
Ogmios 19.01.11
●
Ogmios
1.Nothing
limited/temporary can come from nothing.
2.The
eternal entity/source must not be created because there
exists no beginning and no end.
3.Since
the universe is limited it MUST have an
eternal [unlimited] source.
The logic of something
limited being eternal is one of the typical anti-logics
-paradoxums- of the godless one.
Only egoists, word gambler and hidden or non-hidden
fascist can deny such simple basic logics for what ever
unholy reason, which I dont know.
●
Atheist
You can't
prove your claims
●
Ogmios
Prove me that the sky is blue and when
you come with the lights wave lenght prove me that light
exist. Dont you realize that you're only a self made paper
god.
●
Atheist
I am saddened that you have such a deep
distrust of science
●
Ogmios
Please keep down my friend. I do not
distrust in anything, because the universe is a more than
complex puzzle with many facettes and you
need each peace to get the best picture. So, its not me to
separate the unseparable. Its YOU selfmade paper gods who
separate science from spirituality, this is like reading a
book by denying the existence of its author. Would you deny
this to be a sign of great ignorance?
Ogmios 27.01.11
CHI HA CREATO IL
CREATORE
●
1.Niente
di temporaneo può venire dal nulla.
●
2.L'ente[origine]
eterna non deve essere creata perché in eternita' non
esiste inizio ne fine.
●
3.Siccome
l 'universo non è eterno, ma temporaneo, DEVE
avere una fonte eterna.
Solo gli egoisti senza principi, i giocatori d'azzardo
e i fascisti nascosti e non, possono negare le logiche
di base cosi semplici.
Ogmios 27.01.11
Tell me:
WHO abuses of
religion..
●
megatown
Muslims
are as much theists as a bloody barbarian a holy one.
Hitler
was also trying to get the image of a messiah. If he
was successful you would seriously call the national
socialism a religion.
That
happens to people which has no principles. Blind for
the forest, lost in between the many trees.
● atheist
U are
redefining what god means. a particular worldview does
not equal a god.
●
megatown
A
particular worldview ?
My
friend. To confront the criminal misconception of a
creator which is a bloody monster you call this a
"particular" worldview ? What the hell are you living
for?
What do
you think WHY you have got a brain from the nature? To
use it yourself or to let it being abused by some
unscrupulous godless bloody power hungry one?
● atheist
Of
course there a plenty of bad things that religious
people do that have nothing to do with their religion,
the fact is however that people have done, and
continue to do awful things in the name of their God,
or because of their belief in a God.
●
megatown
Tell me:
WHO abuses of
religion..
●
megatown
The
simple fact to apply to any so called religious
organization does not make one automatically a true
person/believer. That would be too easy my friend. Every godless [=atheist!] functionary of the lie, egoism and power hunger
can do that, yet those systematically misled by them.
So the question if believer or not has nothing to do
with external formalities like the formal belonging to
a religious organization or church. The
question if TRUE believer or not is a personal
decision which every invidual has to make for himself
privately. A TRUE believer however will follow the
authentic archetypes [Jesus Christ, Buddha, Krishna..]
teachings and examples and therefore NEVER abuse of
religion or anything else for any bloody target. Now
the question once again:
~
Have you really considered the weight of the earth
which is 5,972,000,000,000,000,000,000 tons orbiting
at 65,000 mph. Do you know the thrust power required
to get the earth into orbit at such an incredible
speed? Some Atheists say it accumulated the 5.97
sextillion tons of body weight while in orbit at
65,000 mph. Where did 5.97 sextillion tons of matter
come from? How was it propelled without power? We know
gravity holds it in place but where did gravity come
from? The Sun provides the gravity pull. Fine, where
did the Sun come from?
Atheists are in the
illogical position of saying matter created itself,
matter got into a 65,000 mph orbit going by itself,
...the earth orbit needs no maintenance, and the Sun
created itself and the Sun positioned itself and the
Sun maintains its fuel supply.
Matter supposedly built itself up into 5.97 sextillon
tons of orbiting matter spinning at about a thousand
mph to provide a habitable planet for five billion
humans and all of this phenomenon produced itself. Yet
Atheists use thousand dollar words to confound
listeners with inconsequential theories of a godless
Universe, a universe they say could not have been
produced by such an evildoer as they see described in
holy Scripture; yet I don't see the righteous
complaining of the divine ecstacy they are walking in,
in Christ. The Israeli's had no problem with God
parting the Red Sea to save them from the cruel
murderous slavemaster Pharoah. Columbus proved the
Bible true when he navigated around the circle of the
earth (Isaiah 40:22) the world thought was flat. Still
Atheists persist in arguing God could not have created
Himself and therefore cannot exist, without realizing
they are comparing their feeble mortal existence to
God's eternal immortality. Had God Almighty not always
been, nothing could exist. So Creationists say a
Supreme Being with greater power & intelligence did it
all with infinite understanding and power beyond human
comprehension. We do not expect to prove God's
existence in a test tube. The Universe is the evidence
we are presenting to you. No-one can prove God doesn't
exist; so we are here to answer theories visiting
Atheists wish to discuss but please do not waste space
or time with the disdain you feel for believers or the
vindictive you have for your Maker. We hope you will
have a hospitable visit to our video site and that you
will find it thought provoking.
Auf die Frage des PI-Autors,
die da lautet: "Haben
Sie, liebe Leser, weitere Ideen, wie die Religion
zurückgedrängt werden kann, um endlich reine,
öffentlich nicht mehr vernehmbare Privatsache zu
sein, die niemanden mehr belästigt oder beleidigt?"
Antworted
#1 D.Mark (23. Sep 2012 15:28)
im Kommentarbereich
Bisher 69 Kommentare: Ja, allerdings! Mein Vorschlag lautet:
Abschiebung aller Fanatiker der Religion des
Atheismus nach Nordkorea!
ABGESEHEN
DAVON DASS
DIES
IM
BESAGTEN ARTIKELSCHON IMMER
DIE TYPISCHEN AUSREDEN JENER
WAREN DIE DEREN KOMPLEXE GEGENÜBER DER WAHRHEIT IM
GEISTE CHRISTI HINTER DEM
VON DEN MENSCHEN SELBST BELIEBIG MISSBRAUCHTEN UND
INSOFERN
ALLES UND GLEICHZEITIG
NICHTS BEDEUTENDEN WORT "RELGION" ZU VERDECKEN
VERSUCHEN UND DIESE KOMPLEXE DIE UNGESUNDEN FRÜCHTE
DES GEISTES 23,
DEM FALSCHEN HELDENTUM SIND...
Richard Dawkins quoted in
Die Presse „Islam more
problematic than Christianity“
H
Comparingthe spirit/example/principle of
Mohammed with the spirit/example/principle of
Christ
in such a way,
islike
generally sayingthat
a victim can be more problematic than a killer or murderer,
or that the spirit of honesty can
even be more problematic than the
spirit of falsity.
What means for certain people the term
"Christianity". Do they mean the
authentic spirit of Christ [8]
or do they mean all the manipulation
[6] and distortions [6]
that mankind [which those like
Dawkins themselves are part of]brought over it. If
they mean the first one,
they still missed to
explain what is the problem itself with
that. If they meant the
second, they themselves are part
of the problem by
abusing and manipulating with the misleading
emptied word shells.
Finally, until they cant explain
their problem with the spirit of Christ they are again
part of the problem or even the problem
itself, because they hide what they can not speak out
and/or do not want to acknowledge.
Gambler !
published 14.08.13
Btw. it is exactly the by
Dawkin & Co propagated
kind of perverted
abusive→ and
manipulative→
sort of 'science' without the principle which has
'scientifically' found the Jewish
to be a minor race. Yet it is exactly
the same sort of 'science'→ which has brought the bloodiest
disasters over the mankind.
-month odyssey
through the vast taiga two Russian fighters have killed
and partially eaten at least one companion. [..] A search
team had the two [2]
men end of November [11]
2012 [12] discovered
in Siberia.